View source for Thread:Velonews/@comment-27183439-20190107232923/@comment-29936663-20190108040210

Absolutely. Here are a few examples of how it has been handled on the wiki in the past:
*[[Wolf#Special_wolves]]
*[[Hinterland_Studio_Inc.#Trivia]]
*[[Breyerhouse#Trivia]]
*[[Crashed_Prison_Transport_Bus#Trivia]]
*[[Episode_1:_Do_Not_Go_Gentle#Trivia]]
I also just threw together an easter egg section on the Hank's Hatch mission page here:
*[[Hank's_Hatch#Trivia]]
In general, most easter eggs I've encountered haven't been significant enough to warrant their own page, but a page listing easter eggs could be ok I guess. I don't see a reason why you couldn't go ahead and make one.

To be clear, the page MangoFett54 created was not removed ''because'' the subject was an easter egg. It just didn't meet any of the standards for significance, quality, or verifiability. I mean, it would be hard for any other editor to come in and improve the page, because all of the claims seemed pulled out of thin air.

As you can tell, there aren't a whole lot of active users here, which makes it hard to form a consensus, and I don't want to go full tyrannical admin. I'll ping the bureaucrat George and ask him to take a look at this. He has overruled me in the past.